Skip Top Navigation
Evaluation Tools
Evaluation Research
Evaluation Training
Why Evaluate
Stages of the Process
Example
Download the Guide
Evaluation Sourcebook
Introduction
Evaluation questions and indicators
ecological outcomes
socioeconomic outcomes
process outcomes
process outcomes
process outcomes
process outcomes
process outcomes
 
Additional Resources
sources of evaluation data
sources of evaluation data
sources of evaluation data
sources of evaluation data
sources of evaluation data
glossary
index
 
 
 


Why Evaluate?

“Evaluation is critical. It is a way of documenting to funders, the public, and your team how effective your project has been since its inception. Evaluation activities can also help you provide important new information to community members about a local problem so that they can become partner in addressing the problem.”
- Brian Wolcott, Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council, Oregon

“[Establishing a monitoring program has helped us] know for sure if our work plan and implementation is addressing the problems of the decline in species and if we truly have the opportunity to bring back many of the populations
that have been extirpated.”

- The Nature Conservancy, Conasauga River Basin of Georgia

Evaluation helps you achieve your objectives as efficiently and effectively as possible. Insight gained through evaluation enables you to identify the strengths and weaknesses of your approach and adjust accordingly: which aspects of your project work, which don’t, and why? Knowledge of the effectiveness of your strategies can help you maximize the impact of your limited resources.

Evaluation can clarify your project’s role within a complex system. Achieving specific on-the-ground ecological and social changes requires a clear picture of success and how to get there. However, it is likely that you work within complex ecological and social systems where simultaneous activities and a variety of circumstances – from natural disturbances to political cycles – are affecting the status of natural resources, the economy, and the community. Evaluation activities give you a necessary overview of the system and your project’s role within it. This helps you define your desired outcomes and reveals how your efforts directly and indirectly affect these outcomes.

Evaluation improves group dynamics and processes. By facilitating dialogue among people and organizations involved in the project, evaluation activities can help build understanding and support for your project. It can lead to clearer task assignments and greater accountability among project participants.

Evaluation builds support by documenting success. Being able to demonstrate success can promote support from the community and political officials. It can also enhance funding opportunities, because you can show donors how the conservation project is structured and document the positive effects that management is having on the landscape.

“Maybe you find that one of the counties has really great trend information on some organism and you can showcase that and say, ‘hey we ought to be bringing this up to a regional scale.’ Part of this is not only to look for gaps but also to celebrate successes.”
- Kent Fuller, Chicago Wilderness

 

Evaluation helps you deal with uncertainty and change. Linked to the practice of adaptive management, evaluation involves learning from experience and adapting activities accordingly. This approach can foster higher levels of on-the-ground success in the face of unavoidable uncertainties and inevitable change.

How do we know that evaluation matters?
Research on over 100 ecosystem management initiatives across the country indicates that projects that engaged in evaluation activities report significantly greater outcomes of their efforts. Setting clear goals, creating systematic ways to monitor change, and implementing adaptive management approaches improve how groups manage their projects, and in turn make it more likely that they meet their objectives.


With all these benefits, why don’t groups carry out evaluation more often?

  • Many groups feel that they lack the money or the time to engage in evaluation and that time spent “evaluating” or questioning is time taken away from “doing.”
  • Groups may feel threatened by the notion of evaluation, believing that it is judging their actions.
  • Groups may lack the capacity for extensive data collection or sophisticated analysis and feel that evaluation cannot be done any other way.
  • Groups may avoid evaluation because they feel they cannot agree on a clear set of objectives.
  • Groups may simply not question the effectiveness of their strategies or approach.
What happens when groups don’t evaluate?
ö They spend significant money and time pursuing strategies that may not cause change.
ö They do a lot of great things, but no one knows about them, which hinders efforts to expand their project.
ö They lack the clarity of purpose that promotes a sense of ownership in the project and strong support for it.

 

By structuring the process according to your needs, you can overcome many perceived barriers and reap the benefits of evaluation. While some evaluations are complex and require significant time and funds, often evaluation can be accomplished using resources and information that are already available. Furthermore, a lack of evaluation often can be more expensive and time consuming than integrating simple evaluation activities into your project’s way of doing business. This guide leads you through the process of evaluation and provides assistance in how to engage in evaluation activities that are both feasible and relevant for your project.

EMI Home | EM Approach  | About EMI  | Academic Programs  | Information Clearinghouse  | Research  | People  | Events
Copyright © 2004 Ecosystem Management Initiative