Raymond De Young Ph.D.
Ph.D., 1984, University of Michigan
M.S., 1975, Stevens Institute of Technology
B.S., 1974, Stevens Institute of Technology
We face a century of diminishing material and energy abundance while we simultaneously address the climate disruption caused by our past consumption. This bio-physical reality is inevitable. What is not inevitable, however, is the nature of our response. Yet so often we are faced with, not reasonable, but infuriatingly unreasonable behavior. Why is this and what can we do to help people become and stay positively engaged? In short, how can we bring out the best in people despite their facing difficult and often irreversible environmental circumstances?
The depth of the required response is unprecedented. Well before the end of this century industrial society will need to respond with an order-of-magnitude decrease in emissions and a comparable decline in resource consumption. We have previously argued for major reductions in resource consumption but never have changes of this magnitude been envisioned.
Such a decline is needed, some would say long overdue, but it will be hard for us, hard because it demands profoundly different patterns of living. We must accept that our future will be attained through thrift and humility, not by the consumptive growth and boosterism that gave us our material affluence and consumerism.
Yet acceptance is but the first step and not nearly as hard as what comes next. Permanently adapting our individual and group behavior to a long and drawn-out decline in resource availability is not something with which we are familiar. Thus we must pre-familiarize ourselves with the behaviors needed for the leaner times ahead. We must plan for, motivate and maintain deep, yet meaningful, behavior change starting with each of us, where we are, now. And we need to start this transition while we still have the currrent surpluses of social, psychological and resource capital.
1. Planning for foundational sustainability: Transitioning quickly to the local.
We can pursue localization, a process compatible with a viable and satisfying existence on a finite planet.
2. Motivating environmental stewardship: Living lightly, now.
We can draw on deeper forms of motivation to promote environmentally responsible behavior, including intrinsic motivation and our fascination with building and maintaining competence.
3. Maintaining human wellness: Using nature, tranquility and activity to enhance well-being.
The transition we must make is crucial and overdue, but hard. Since burned out people can neither heal the planet nor live sustainably, they too must be healed and supported. We can use the powerful effect on human well-being of nearby nature, in all its forms.
Behavior and Environment - Introduction to environmental psychology that examines human-environment interactions with a focus on environmental stewardship. Course develops an information processing model of human nature and uses it to explore human behavior, the settings humans prefer and best function in, and how they maintain mental clarity in the face of difficult environmental circumstances.
Psychology of Environmental Stewardship - Explores research on psychology of environmental stewardship and creates a toolbox of approaches for promoting durable conservation behavior.
Localization Seminar: Transitional Thinking for the New Normal - How ever vast were the resources used to create industrial civilization, they were never limitless. We can accept that transition to a frugal life pattern is inevitable, yet the specific form of our response is not preordained. The course develops a plausible response called localization. It focuses on place-based living within the biophysical limits of nearby natural systems, the drivers of localization and the tools needed to make the transition peaceful, democratic, just and resilient.
(Full downloadable set at ResearchGate)
De Young, R., K. Scheuer, J. Roush and K. Kozeleski (2016). Student interest in campus community gardens: Sowing the seeds for direct engagement with sustainability. In W. Leal Filho and M. Zint (Eds.) The Contribution of Social Sciences to Sustainable Development at Universities. World Sustainability Series. Pp. 161-175, Switzerland: Springer.
De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. In Zelezny, L. and P. W. Schultz [Eds.] Promoting Environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526.